Canada: Supreme Court judge rules police conduct racist, but Indigenous land defenders鈥 convictions remain

February 28, 2025
Issue 
Convictions against Corey Jocko (left), Shaylynn Sampson (middle) and Sleydo鈥 (Molly Wickham) for blocking a gas pipeline remain. Background: Canadian police protecting the Coastal GasLink pipeline in British Columbia.

British Columbia Supreme Court Justice Michael Tammen on February 18 that Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) officers made 鈥済rossly offensive, racist and dehumanizing鈥 remarks about Indigenous women and violated their Canadian Charter Rights and Freedoms rights during policing of a blockade of Coastal GasLink pipeline construction. The finding came after Indigenous land defenders filed an application to dismiss charges against them due to police conduct during their arrests in 2021.

The three land defenders are: Sleydo鈥 (Molly Wickham), a wing chief of the Gidimt鈥檈n Clan of the Wet鈥檚uwet鈥檈n Nation; Shaylynn Sampson, a Gitxsan woman; and Corey Jocko, a Kanien鈥檏eh谩:ka (Mohawk) man from Akwesasne.

After more than a year of court proceedings, Tammen found that police breached the land defenders鈥 Section 7 rights (protecting life, liberty and security of person) during a raid, by breaching multiple structures to make arrests without having a warrant for entry. The land defenders had refused police entry and warned them that they needed a warrant prior to the breaches and arrests.

Despite this, Tammen did not throw out the land defenders鈥 convictions, but said that they 鈥 along with another activist 鈥 will receive a reduction in their sentences because of the finding. Tammen had found the three guilty last year of criminal contempt of the court for breaking an injunction against disrupting work on the Coastal GasLink pipeline.

Police defend extractive capital

Tammen鈥檚 findings are yet another in the litany of abuses carried out by police operating in the RCMP鈥檚 infamous Community-Industry Response Group (C-IRG). Since renamed as the Critical Response Unit 鈥 British Columbia (CRU), the unit works in the service of the extractivist industry to put down Indigenous and environmental resistance. It is a secretive unit, and little is known publicly about its structure or operational procedures.

The court case heard disturbing details of RCMP behaviour, including extreme violence and racism.

One RCMP officer聽聽an Indigenous person who had been arrested as a 鈥渂ig fucking ogre-looking dude鈥.

Officers were also heard making degrading comments about symbols worn by Indigenous women to honour murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls. One officer , 鈥淒o they have fucking face paint, too? They鈥檙e not orcs?鈥, referring to Sleydo鈥 and Sampson wearing red dresses and red paint handprints on their faces.

The court heard that the RCMP deployed snipers as part of its 鈥渓ethal overwatch鈥 strategy against land defenders. Sergeant Ryan Arnold of the RCMP鈥檚 Emergency Response Team testified that 鈥淲e were there to provide lethal-force overwatch for the tac [tactical] team to go hands-on with people who need to be arrested.鈥

Another officer, Corporal Sebastien Pilote, suggested sending a police dog into the structures occupied by the land defenders.

Tammen police conduct as 鈥渆xtremely serious鈥 and 鈥渋nvolving racism directed towards Indigenous women 鈥 a group that has been systemically disadvantaged through all sectors of the criminal justice system for generations鈥.

鈥淭he comments about the red face paint were not made by a single officer and were not a one-off occurrence.鈥

He noted that police made multiple 鈥渙ffensive and discriminatory comments鈥 in November 2021, and that it 鈥渋s potentially a sign of systemic attitudinal issue within the C-IRG鈥.

Apologies rejected

Tammen also rejected apologies made by senior RCMP officers during the proceedings, finding that they were insufficient remedies for the damage the racist comments had done.

Following the decision, the three defenders, along with their lawyer Frances Mahon, Chief Na鈥橫oks and Chief Woos, hosted an Instagram live discussion.

Mahon noted the uncommon nature of these findings within the Canadian colonial court system: 鈥淭he court found that the conduct of the police officers abused the court鈥檚 process.

鈥淭his is an extraordinarily rare finding, and it demonstrates how serious the police officers鈥 misconduct was,鈥 she said.

鈥淚n particular, it was a rebuke to the C-IRG members who thought it was appropriate to say the most egregious, racist things about beautiful Indigenous women when they thought nobody could hear them.鈥

Sampson reminded participants of the colonial nature of the RCMP, which was 鈥渃reated to take our children from our territories and put them in residential schools. They were created to keep us off our territory.鈥

This work continues today, Sampson said. 鈥淭hey remove us from our land; they criminalise us; they put us through years and years of court battles in a system that was made to undermine our hereditary governance structures.鈥澛

While the findings are certainly a public relations blow for the RCMP, there should be no illusions that it will change their behaviour. C-IRG/CRU officers have not been charged for their actions, the unit has not been disbanded 鈥 as human rights advocates have 鈥 and it still operates as a security force for private capital.

More generally, there is no oversight and 鈥 which communities need and want 鈥 for police in Canada.

The court case against Sleydo鈥, Sampson and Jocko will resume on April 3 to set a date for their sentencing.

You need 一品探花, and we need you!

一品探花 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.