CEPU Tasmania slams gov鈥檛 鈥榓sset leasing鈥 plans

March 5, 2025
Issue 
Gordon Dam
The Communications Electrical Plumbing Union says it will oppose efforts to privatise Hydro Tasmania, which manages 30 hydro-electric power stations. Photo: JJ Harrison/Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

The Communications Electrical Plumbing Union (CEPU) has slammed the Tasmanian Liberal government鈥檚 proposal to sell off energy assets.

Premier that his government would make 鈥渁 detailed assessment of the benefits of moving several entities out of government ownership鈥, with Metro Tasmania, the Land Titles Office and the Motor Accident Insurance Board on the sell-off list.

He said Hydro Tasmania would not be sold.

However, CEPU Secretary Chris Clark warned on March 5 that 鈥渁sset leasing鈥 is the equivalent of privatisation. 鈥淎 99-year lease is a sale. If it鈥檚 leased, it鈥檚 as good as sold 鈥 it鈥檚 gone,鈥 Clark said.

鈥淧rivatisation doesn鈥檛 work anywhere, ever. You don鈥檛 take a profitable, essential asset, sell it for pennies on the dollar, never see another cent in the future, and call it a good deal.

鈥淭asmania will not be better off selling a profitable asset for next to nothing just to pay for this government鈥檚 other mistakes.鈥

The CEPU represents energy workers in the Hydro Tasmania and TasNetworks, both of which are partly privatised already, known as (GBE).

Clark said the economic case for privatisation is 鈥渋ndefensible鈥.

He said TasNetworks does need 鈥渁 management cleanout鈥, but it should not be sold.

鈥淲e鈥檝e seen this playbook before. In 1999, the Liberals tried to sell Hydro Tasmania for just 20% of its actual value 鈥 a terrible deal for the state.鈥

Queensland Premier Campbell Newman took a 99-year power lease proposal to the Queensland election in 2015 and it became 鈥渢he worst electoral defeat in Australian history, fuelled by the community-driven #Not4Sale campaign鈥.

鈥淲e will mobilise the same resistance here,鈥 Clark said.

鈥淭his isn鈥檛 about economics: it鈥檚 about ideology. No credible economist supports privatisation. This is just another failed trickle-down experiment, the same ideology that has eroded Tasmanian and Australian living standards since John Howard鈥檚 Liberals embraced it.

鈥淭asNetworks is currently mismanaged. That鈥檚 because of its half-privatised GBE model.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a mess of competing interests pretending to be a public service while really acting as a greedy corporation. Full privatisation would only make it worse 鈥 higher prices, massive job cuts and an unaccountable private monopoly.鈥

Clark pointed to Victoria and South Australia鈥檚 privatisation of their power networks in the 1990s as proof that it does not work. It led to large scale job cuts and skyrocketing energy prices.

鈥淰ictoria鈥檚 energy privatisation directly contributed to the Black Saturday bushfires 鈥 a devastating loss of life caused by private companies cutting maintenance to increase profits.

鈥淎cross Australia, governments are now being forced to re-nationalise assets because private investors have bled them dry and walked away.

鈥淧rivatisation is a failed experiment 鈥 and we refuse to let Tasmania become the next cautionary tale.鈥

You need 一品探花, and we need you!

一品探花 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.