
The 118 coal and gas projects in the planning system, identified in the , make a mockery of federal to act on climate change.
Lock the Gate Alliance is among many organisations to point out that Australia's ability to meet its (low) emission reduction goals is 鈥渟everely threatened鈥.
Lock the Gate Alliance national coordinator Carmel Flint said on December 20: 鈥淓ven if just a handful of these projects are actually built, they will push climate change dangerously close to a point of no return鈥.
She said if the federal government鈥檚 new emissions reductions rules on big industrial polluters allow for these coal and gas projects to go ahead, 鈥渙ur biggest polluters will effectively get a free pass鈥.
One contentious project is . For more than a decade it has been demanding it be given approval to frack for coal seam gas in the Pilliga state forest, north-west New South Wales.
United opposition from the Gomeroi, farmers and regional and city-based campaigners has . But in September 2020, the NSW Independent Planning Commission approved the project. This was despite receiving a record number of oppositional submissions 鈥 more than 10,000.
One more obstacle was removed on December 20, when the that Santos could go ahead 鈥 with one condition.
This is despite the Gomeroi people not giving their consent. They rejected a confidential offer in March, prompting Santos to go to the NNTT for a determination.
The applied in 2011 for native title over 111,317 square kilometres, but their claim is yet to be determined.
They were claimants in the NNTT case. The Native Title Act, states that when a dispute between a state or territory government and a group of applicants erupts over a lease, the parties are obliged to negotiate 鈥渋n good faith鈥.
Judge John Dowsett noted in his summary that the Gomeroi made 鈥渘umerous assertions concerning Santos鈥檚 participation in the negotiations鈥 but concluded that 鈥渋t had not demonstrated absence of good faith鈥.
He also noted that the Gomeroi 鈥渟ubmitted that the proposed grants should not be made, asserting that the Narrabri Gas Project would result in grave and irreversible consequences for the Gomeroi People鈥檚 culture, lands and waters and would contribute to climate change鈥.
However, the NNTT concluded that the Gomeroi 鈥渉ad failed to justify its assertions that the proposed grants would have such effect upon the matters identified鈥.
It 鈥渃oncluded that the proposed grants would provide a public benefit, significantly outweighing the Gomeroi applicant鈥檚 concerns鈥. However, Santos has to undertake additional 鈥渃ultural heritage research鈥 before moving ahead.
Given state and federal government support for gas, it is not surprising the NNTT, a federal government body, found that there was a 鈥減ublic benefit鈥 for the CSG project, and that it would 鈥渙utweigh鈥 the cultural and environmental concerns of the Gomeroi people.
Raymond 鈥淏ubbly鈥 Weatherall, who has been fighting the oil and gas giant for many years, told 一品探花 on December 21 that the fight is far from over.
He said that from the early days Santos had never negotiated in 鈥済ood faith鈥. Even during the height of the pandemic it had demanded meetings with vulnerable First Nations鈥 claimants, Weatherall said.
鈥淣o amount of royalties would change the Gomeroi鈥檚 minds about this project,鈥 he said. 鈥淎t risk [from coal seam gas] are Liverpool鈥檚 鈥榖lack plains鈥, the Great Artesian Basin and precious water. The produce from this area goes all over the country.鈥
Weatherall also queried how Santos鈥 850 gas wells fit into聽the federal government鈥檚 carbon reduction emission plan of 40% by 2030. 鈥淪urely, it鈥檚 clear that this is not climate justice?鈥
鈥淭he fight for the Billiga has been going on for many years, and it鈥檚 not over yet,鈥 Weatherall said.
Over the years Santos has had considerable backing in its campaign to open up the Narrabri to CSG.
Despite widespread scientific and cultural concerns about likely damage to the Great Artesian Basin, the problem of disposing of salt waste,聽Santos鈥 own malpractices, the weight of the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA), the NSW Coalition government and, since June, the Labor government have聽helped Santos push ahead.
There is little doubt that if Santos gets the final go-ahead, the Narrabri would be just the first of many gas fields in north-west NSW.
鈥淚f Narrabri meets all the environmental standards, and by all accounts it does, then it makes sense for it to go ahead,鈥 resources minister in June.
鈥淚t is an important gas reserve that will help the population of New South Wales address a future power crisis,鈥 she added. 鈥淚t avoids a crisis, is what it does, because it means more gas closer to your systems.鈥
The argument about a gas shortage and price reductions if we had more gas has been refuted and .
As Richard Denniss of pointed out, the 鈥渂ig lie鈥 was exposed this winter as energy prices started to soar.
After spending big 鈥 $80 billion 鈥 on infrastructure on the east coast, the gas companies are looking at big profits.
鈥淣ow the Australian gas industry, which is actually 95 per cent foreign-owned, can sell our gas overseas at the world price rather than to Australians at the cost of production. Unsurprisingly, it has been putting the interests of shareholders first ever since,鈥 Denniss said in 鈥.
Australia鈥檚 policy makers did not see high gas prices as a problem to be avoided, Denniss said. 鈥淭his was the plan all along.鈥
Meanwhile, Santos acquired the Queensland Hunter Gas Pipeline in November to transport gas from the Narrabri to the east coast. The 200-metre wide pipeline corridor goes through floodplains, productive farming land, horse studs and small lifestyle blocks to the Pilliga Forest.
Farmer , who leases a property in the Narrabri Lateral Pipeline鈥檚 path, said farmers oppose new high pressure pipelines coming through their land. 鈥淔armers, some of who are in the middle of trying to harvest, coming out of months of sustained flooding.鈥
The pipeline would cause significant environmental impacts, jeopardise and disrupt high-value farmland and would become a stranded asset as the energy sector transforms.
APA Group,聽Australia's largest natural gas infrastructure business, announced in November it would not go ahead with the Western Slopes Pipeline, Santos鈥 preferred pipeline, after .
The same is now happening along the route of the Queensland Hunter Gas Pipeline.
Santos still has a fight on its hands.
摆础听 is being held on January 14聽at the聽Coonabarabran Footy Fields.]